In assessing Tesla Motors' strategy, which aspect would be irrelevant for your review?

In the context of evaluating a company's strategy, the number of competitive assets versus liabilities would be less relevant for a review of Tesla Motors' strategy compared to the other aspects. Evaluating a company's strategic positioning often requires an understanding of how it performs relative to its competitors, how it is perceived in the market, and its financial performance indicators.

Sales growth compared to the industry provides insight into how well Tesla is capturing market share and growing against its competitors, which is critical for understanding its strategic effectiveness. Similarly, analyzing the firm’s image and reputation is vital because these factors can significantly influence consumer behavior and brand loyalty, especially in the automotive industry where brand perception plays a crucial role in purchasing decisions. Profit margin comparisons are also important, as they shed light on the company’s operational efficiency and profitability, which can indicate long-term viability and strategic soundness.

Overall, focusing on the number of competitive assets and liabilities does not provide a complete picture of Tesla's performance or its strategic direction, making it less critical in this assessment. In contrast, the other elements directly inform aspects of competitive dynamics, market positioning, and financial health that are essential to evaluating the effectiveness of the company's strategy.